March 1, 2019

Trump and Trust.  

by Hal Gershowitz

Comments Below

Of Thee I Sing Heading Authors“Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.”Albert Einstein

Einstein, as usual, had an important point to make. Trust, judgment and truthfulness are inseparable. Trust in another, especially a leader, is more about how he or she carefully contemplates then about how he or she hastily calculates. Trust in a leader reflects the consistency of his or her good judgment, of his or her candor and, also, trust in a leader is nourished by the quality of his or her inner circle. Do we trust those whom he or she trusts? Trust is also a feeling in the gut. It is not a prize easily won by glibness, superficiality or boorishness.

President Donald Trump is somewhat of an enigma. He is inscrutable. He does and says things with remarkable regularity that make no sense to the vast majority of his countrymen. This essay is not intended as a “hit piece,” although many of our readers may take it as such. While we have often been critical of the President, we actually take every opportunity that materializes to give him credit where we think credit is due. But over and over again his judgment, his demeanor and his proclivity to lash out suggest more of a deficit than a display of either wisdom or strength.  To be sure, he is a constant target of criticism, some of it excessive to say the least. But that has been a reality with which many of our leaders have had to contend. They generally took the heat and stayed in the kitchen. Most knew better than to turn criticism from the press and other opponents into a cage fight.

The President’s judgment on matters large and small do not inspire trust. By and large, people hope, rather than trust, that his judgment is sound. We hope he knows what he is doing when he embarks on a course of action with our allies that causes his most respected cabinet officer to throw up his hands in frustration and resign. Make no mistake about it, Jim Mattis’s departure from President Trump’s cabinet was a major loss. President Trump’s decision to announce a US withdrawal from Syria (later largely rescinded) without, apparently, discussing it with his Secretary of Defense was not the act of a strong President, but, instead, that of an amateur acting on impulse rather than wisdom.  Former Secretary Mattis laid out his reasons for resigning in an appropriate letter of resignation, concluding with the statement that President Trump deserved a Secretary of Defense whose views were more in line with the President’s and gave President Trump sixty-day’s notice of his retirement. President Trump then, unceremoniously, fired on the spot this extraordinary public servant. His public scorn of his own appointees is unprecedented. He has practiced the art of humiliation in his references to former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

Finally, his embrace of autocrats is not just unusual, but foolish and dangerous. It telegraphs all the wrong qualities of an inexperienced chief-of-state. It speaks of extreme naïveté and smacks of very limited competence. His embrace of Vladimir Putin in Helsinki was breathtaking. When asked about Russian interference in our Presidential election he stated before the entire world, “I don’t know why they would.”  Later, in the face of world-wide criticism, he had spokeswoman Sanders explain that he meant to say “I don’t know why they would not.”

His personal brand of diplomacy with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un has been amateurish and predictably foolish. His meetings with Dictator Kim Jong Un were not accomplishments, they were gifts. No other American Presidents have chosen to fly half-way around the world to meet with the murderous dictators of North Korea simply because they knew better. President Trump’s lavish praise of Kim Jong Un and his swoon over the love letters they have exchanged is an embarrassment and an affront to the parents of Otto Warmbeir who was imprisoned and then, essentially, murdered by Kim Jong Un’s henchmen. This, after President Trump put Otto Warmbeir’s parents on display during his State-of-the-Union address a year ago, along with a young man who had escaped from Kim Jong Un’s brutal kingdom.

When President Trump suggests before the world that he doesn’t know why Vladimir Putin would interfere in our elections since he vociferously denied doing so, or why Kim Jong Un would have had the Warmbeir boy tortured lifelessly when he said he knew nothing about it, or that Saudi Crown Prince Salman would have had Washington Post journalist Khashoggi murdered and dismembered when he denied any knowledge of the affair, he embarrasses us all.

This is not being careless with the truth in the small matters as Einstein wrote so long ago.  No, this is being careless with the truth in huge matters.

Available at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Kindle, Apple iBooks, Nook and wherever better books are sold.

Cry Eden cover_blue

All comments regarding these essays, whether they express agreement, disagreement, or an alternate view, are appreciated and welcome. Comments that do not pertain to the subject of the essay or which are ad hominem references to other commenters are not acceptable and will be deleted.

Invite friends, family, and colleagues to receive “Of Thee I Sing 1776” online commentaries. Simply copy, paste, and email them this link—https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/su/ILPzgKS  –and they can begin receiving, free of charge, these weekly essays every Sunday morning.

7 responses to “Trump and Trust.  ”

  1. m m kaback md says:

    BRAVO!! See my note of February 19th, 2019, “The Trump Way of Doing Things: A Real National Emergency.”

  2. Perry says:

    While Trump is despicable in far too many ways, but there has been progress under his leadership even though he seems at times to be impatient with his own process and the the progress of the Ship of State. Hardly a person without harboring personal bias against him can duplicate his achievements.He is a proven non-political speaker as he often inflates the truth. But sincerely believes he is doing the right thing given the intense animosity he faces on a daily basis.Conversely he has positioned himself as an odds on favorite in 2020 given the current crop of Socialist/Democrat opponents.I ask all if you were Trump and people, every day, demanded to see your tax returns and discuss your infidelity (plural) rather than recognize your successes, would you not have them talk about your seat-of-the-
    pants governance which does resonate with some.We lived through the Obama years, we will survive the Trump era and let history be his final judge.
    PS I support him but wince at his Tweets, but marvel at his accomplishments.

  3. susan duman says:

    The metaphor of Einstein is superb.
    You help me stay rational in these trying times. And I do think this experience has caused an edginess across all thinking voters.
    I wonder if it’s similar to the way people felt during the wars.

  4. Paul Silverstein says:

    Trump is a president like none other in our country’s history, yet his flamboyance and looseness with veracity doesn’t by any means disqualify him from the office. As best I know, no personality traits are described in the Constitution. It appears you would like someone directly out of central casting portraying how you think a president should behave. His familiarity with the multitude of cogent domestic and international issues facing our country were on display yesterday when he spoke 2 hours virtually extemporaneously without benefit of notes or teleprompter at the CPAC meeting. Yes there may have been exaggerations and stretches from the bare truth but he does not rely on tightly scripted speeches written by the likes of Jon Favreau or Ben Rhodes that are read verbatim from a teleprompter. I suspect the authors are having trouble accepting Trump’s unorthodoxy and his disruptive style. He has been willing to confront many very vital long neglected national and international issues that his predecessors had studiously avoided out of timidity and neglect. There is the old adage which applies here, “Stop just listening to his lips and watch his feet”.
    Thus far he has accomplished considerablely and has not gotten us into a war by virtue of what you regard as his loose lips! I urge you to take a more holistic view of our 44th Chief Executive.
    The nation had plenty of opportunity to understand who this man was and how he operated before he was duly elected in 2016. Accept him for who he is and support him as our President.

  5. Steve Marcus says:

    In Venezuela Chavez also spoke uninterrupted for two hours at a time and look where that got the poor people of that country who believed what he was feeding them. Sometimes it takes a while for the “bill” to come due.

  6. Michael Gong says:

    I love reading your blogs because they give me hope that there are still a few rational people on the planet who retain a strong moral compass, but I am in a deep pessimistic funk. Mr Trump has just gone through one of the worst weeks in his seemingly bottomless administration, what with Cohen, Stone, Kim, and yet his approval numbers have actually gone up. And all the Democrats can come up with are two geriatrics and a bunch of populist/socialists with impossible plans to run against him in 2020. It seems like history will look back on us and conclude that slavery was our original sin which was later compounded by Andrew Johnson’s mindless policy to allow it to continue in another form. What began with such noble intentions are unraveling before our very eyes. Tell me I’m wrong.

    • In Response to Michael Gong: Actually, there are some remarkable (and sad) similarities between President Trump and President Andrew Johnson. They both use(d) executive privilege to do end runs around Congress, and they both could ramble prodigiously at the podium. Even, today, some see rambling at rallies as a virtue. Sadly, Presidents Trump and Johnson both, from a historical perspective, had (have) a tendency to look backward rather than forward. We’ve had “unraveling” periods before in our history. We’re betting on the Constitution, and that the same better angels in our body politic in whom Lincoln had confidence so long ago will still prevail.

Leave a Reply to Perry Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.