PROFILES IN POLTROONERY

Or, simply stated, the opposite of Profiles in Courage.

Poltroonery is an old word, befitting some old men or younger men with an ossified sense of ethics and a diminished sense of honor. Chuck Grassley, Kevin McCarthy, and Steve Scalise come to mind. They qualify as profiles in Poltroonery, or, let’s just say it, self-centered, self-interested political hackery, who will do what they have to do, and say what they have to say to get re-elected. Conversely, Liz Cheney and a pitifully small group of Republicans will undoubtedly be remembered by history as genuine Profiles in Courage.

There are only two reasons for a public figure to dance around the affront that January 6th was, and is, to American constitutional democracy; malignant partisanship or rank political cowardice.

lt is of no particular surprise that McCarthy and Scalise have turned out to be Toadies for Trump. They are relatively young, exceedingly ambitious, and will do whatever they have to do to pander to the former President. He holds sway over their once honorable party for the time being, and rather than honorably fight that sad reality, they pander to it.

Senator Grassley is another matter. Political ambition can’t be his motivation to pander. He’s an old man who will be pushing 100 by the time his next Senate stint ends, assuming Iowa voters return him to the Senate next year. There’s no mystery why Grassley joined former President Trump at his Iowa rally earlier this week. He told us why. “If I didn’t accept the endorsement of a person that’s got 91% of the Republican voters in Iowa, I wouldn’t be too smart. I’m smart enough to accept that endorsement.”

This, from the same man who only months ago said of former President Trump, “he continued to argue that the election had been stolen even though the courts didn’t back up his claims,” and “belittled and harassed elected officials across the country to get his way…. encouraged his own, loyal vice president, Mike Pence, to take extraordinary and unconstitutional actions during the Electoral College count. There’s no doubt in my mind that President Trump’s language was extreme, aggressive, and irresponsible,” Trump, he said, “must take responsibility for their destructive actions that day.” Well, that was smart. What he had to say at the Iowa rally, however, wasn’t smart. It was simply craven.

What is really tragic about Senator Grassley’s genuflect to Trump is that it wasn’t essential to his re-election. Grassley enjoys exceptionally high approval ratings in Iowa. He was the ideal Republican to stand up to Trump, the man he called irresponsible and the man he said had demanded that his Vice President take extraordinary and unconstitutional actions on January 6th.

Then again, so many members of my old party have turned out to be craven toadies, or as Merriam-Webster would put it, “lacking the least bit of courage, or contemptibly fainthearted.”

Grassley and the others have, with eyes wide open, chosen to make a Faustian bargain with the former President. In effect, we won’t publicly admit that you lost the election or encouraged the deadly insurrection on January 6th, which was a blatant attack on American constitutional democracy. In return, you will praise us, and you won’t endorse or support whoever might run against us in the next election cycle. Such Faustian bargains never work out well in the long run, but as the late economist John Maynard Keynes once famously said, “In the long run, we’ll all be dead.”

Most Republicans cringe at Trump’s anti-democratic nonsense and demagoguery and his outrageous penchant for lying with such complete abandon. They rationalize that putting up with such behavior is an acceptable price to pay to stay in power. Elsewhere today, and in the past, others have made the same mistake. Never poke the bear, they rationalize, and we’ll stay in power. Other American politicians knew better. As John Kennedy reminded my generation sixty years ago, “Those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

But sadly, we’ve seen this craven pandering before. It has become the Republican game plan, and it may well yield a short-term tactical advantage. However, it is likely to result in long-term strategic disaster for them and, quite possibly, for the rest of the country as well.

Seventy years ago, Polish-American poet Czeslaw Milosz described in his international bestseller, The Captive Mind, how the political toadies of the day behaved in the presence of the authoritarian strongmen on whose good graces they had hitched their wagons. “Some were recalcitrant; some tried not to show how much his favor meant to them; some were openly servile. In a short time, he was surrounded by a court of yes-men who frowned when he frowned or guffawed loudly whenever he deigned to tell a joke.”

Sound familiar?

7 thoughts on “PROFILES IN POLTROONERY”

  1. Calling out the Republicans that are supporting Trump is indeed
    fair but let’s not forget the inaction of Sen. Shumer not challenging Anti Antisemitism spouted by the hateful Omar and Thaib among other Democratic Congress members.

    To point out the shame in the Republican circles is fair but not
    when balanced by a shameful administration and Democratic
    appointees, many of whom come with horrid resumes and a
    history of political thought which is quite alarming to say the
    least.

  2. Your response today felt somewhat philosophical. I share that explanation.
    What sustains me in terms of the future is my belief that our youth, once they have gained maturity, will use their brains and morality to manage progress, even with forces of social media and Facebook. Challenging, but “not our first rodeo”.
    Susan D

  3. Then there is H.L. Mencken’s use of the adjective form, “poltroonish.” He must have been in an unusually foul mood when he penned this one:

    It is; for example; one of my firmest and most sacred beliefs; reached after an inquiry extending over a score of years and supported by incessant prayer and meditation; that the government of the United States; in both its legislative arm and its executive arm; is ignorant; incompetent; corrupt; and disgusting—and from this judgment I except no more than twenty living lawmakers and no more than twenty executioners of their laws. It is a belief no less piously cherished that the administration of justice in the Republic is stupid; dishonest; and against all reason and equity—and from this judgment I except no more than thirty judges; including two upon the bench of the Supreme Court of the United States. It is another that the foreign policy of the United States—its habitual manner of dealing with other nations; whether friend or foe—is hypocritical; disingenuous; knavish; and dishonorable—and from this judgment I consent to no exceptions whatever; either recent or long past. And it is my fourth (and; to avoid too depressing a bill; final) conviction that the American people; taking one with another; constitute the most timorous; sniveling; poltroonish; ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages; and that they grow more timorous; more sniveling; more poltroonish; more ignominious every day.

  4. The only two current Profiles in Courage are Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and the lady Senator from Arizona.
    Sen.Schumer, Rep. Schiff, the little fat boy from Brooklyn, and other Jews never stood up once to denounce Anti-Semitism by the Group of Four. Now these sycophants just endorse the puppet in the White House. Biden is clueless about anything because others are making the policies and he reads the teleprompter (a la Obama). Biden cannot answer any questions to the media at all.
    Many of my Democratic friends realize what a poor choice they made in 2020. By 2022, Republicans will control the Congress and Biden will become a dead duck for 2 more years.

  5. Stuart, I cold not agree more. I am not Jewish and suspect I hear more anti Jewish sentiments than most because of that…Ugh! Believe me I set folks straight when it is brought up around me as a “joke” or not!

    It is appalling to me that this administration is mute on Anti-Semitism and yet continue to “fall in line” of the extreme……

  6. Hal,
    Thanks for the clear cogent essay & your research response to ‘Judy’, although since factual information is not held in high regard your effort will be wasted.
    To reach moral equivalency & outrage about the freshman ‘gang of four’ representatives & mature( very questionable) folks like Grassley, Graham, McCarthy & the like is laughable in its stretch.
    Chuck

Comments are closed.