December 3, 2021


by Hal Gershowitz

Comments Below

For most of our 240 years, the American people have generally avoided the mad dog of extremism. America’s two political parties today, not so much.

While that might seem like a contradiction, it really isn’t. In America, many, perhaps most, political candidates have traditionally campaigned well to the right or well to the left of center. Still, they have generally tacked back toward the center once in power. After all, we have, with few exceptions, generally been a centrist country. Candidates, of course, want to distinguish themselves from their opponents. Once in power, however, cooperation becomes essential in a constitutional democracy such as ours, a democracy with a bicameral legislature.

Research demonstrates that Americans have, in the past, rarely embraced the political extremes. We had remained rooted pretty much at the center, some center-right, and some center-left. That has been our strength. Not so today. Our political parties, or at least those politicians within the parties who command the lion’s share of print, broadcast, and social media time and space, often campaign from the outer reaches of their respective parties. Firing up the base is, after all, as American as home-baked Apple Pie.

Not so long ago, political opponents campaigned by making a case that they could best address the issues that most concerned the voters. Those issues are well understood. People want a decent shot at economic security, affordable healthcare, and a chance to retire with dignity. During the Nixon-Kennedy debates, both candidates acknowledged that each wanted what was best for the country, and each explained why he would be the better president to achieve those goals. Today’s political debates are more akin to cage fights where each candidate looks to draw blood for the kill.

Too many campaigns plot to convince voters that the opposition will bring despair and the destruction of America as we know it. Political candidates campaign like a not-so-endearing Professor Harold Hill, warning about deadly trouble in River City, and inciting voters about all there is to fear. Selling fear works, and there is always a grab bag of issues about which voters might be legitimately concerned. But when political rhetoric is based mainly on focus-group determinations or other research demonstrating where and how fear can be conjured, then you can bet fear will be conjured.

Bill McInturff, who founded the Republican polling firm Public Opinion Strategies seemed to sum up where we are pretty well. “I am not sanguine about a national campaign that tries to find a middle ground on major cultural issues as being viable. We are in a “no compromise” era, and that’s not changing anytime soon,” says McInturff. And he is probably correct. The hard work of political organizing takes place well to the left and right of the center. The moderate middle or center is large, but not as well organized as the left and right wings of our two-party system. Compromise is simply not in the air.

While the vast majority of Americans simply want their government to work, the vast majority of political rhetoric today is not about making government work better. Instead, the campaigns are about convincing voters that their government is their enemy, that it doesn’t work—at least not in the hands of the political opposition. As fast as one can say anti-establishmentarianism politicians on the left and on the right campaign to denigrate their opponents rather than sell their vision of a stronger and more equitable America.

Today, as in the past, when voters are asked what issues concern them the most, they almost always talk about economic security, retirement security, and the cost of healthcare. These are the things about which people really care. Still, the constant political din in the background assaults the senses with endless ranting about race, crime, gay rights, trans rights, abortion rights, and other divisive issues. These are all issues that deserve intelligent understanding and reflection, but they are used as trigger issues to engender fear and distrust, if not heated anger. Politicians understand that the media will give these personal and contentious issues more time and space than the humdrum issues that put food on the table and assure that those who are ill will find affordable care. Divisiveness as a political strategy often works at swaying votes but at a terrible price.

To be sure, there have always been strident voices on the campaign trail. But, today, those voices have become a constant drumbeat warning of a lurking calamity being shepherded by the political opposition. Not so many years ago, such negativity might have appeared as an editorial in a local newspaper, perhaps counterbalanced by an opinion piece in a competing newspaper. Today, voters are besieged with political negativity coming at them from talk radio, highly partisan cable television, and all manner of social media where three-quarters of the country now consumes endless rants from trolls and self-styled provocateurs disguised as serious people with serious counsel to convey.

These political performers are selling calculated discord and divisiveness on a scale we’ve never seen before. As a result, the mood in the country has grown churlish and grouchy.  The Pew Research Center has studied the country’s mood and found that about 80 percent of American voters today believe that the election of the other side would be calamitous to our country. This is scary stuff. Our two political camps have become more like seriously warring enemy camps, each dedicated to the belief that calamity awaits us if the opposition prevails at the voting booth.

This is not politics as usual. These are campaigns of destruction. The country has evolved from a labor-intensive economy toward a new reality where machines labor and think and learn and perform numerous tasks. Concurrently, we have a rapidly changing demographic landscape, and these new realities have created a circumstance ripe for demagoguery and divisiveness.

We are off balance and whether or not we will regain our equilibrium in time to restore comity to life in America is uncertain. Commentators and politicians on the far left and the far right spare no opportunity to enrage their followers. They are like Fido growling and chasing after the car. They might just catch it. It won’t be a pretty sight.

As it is written: he that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind. Proverbs 11:29

All comments regarding these essays, whether they express agreement, disagreement, or an alternate view, are appreciated and welcome. Comments that do not pertain to the subject of the essay or which are ad hominem references to other commenters are not acceptable and will be deleted.

Invite friends, family, and colleagues to receive “Of Thee I Sing 1776” online commentaries. Simply copy, paste, and email them this link—  –and they can begin receiving these weekly essays every Sunday morning.


  1. Perry Altshule says:

    I truly believe that comity is lost between the two extremes in politics. That being said there is no room for a third party. You must choose which of the parties best addresses your opinion and which or the parties extremes you least agree with.

  2. Chris Haedt says:

    Very well written essay, Hal. Totally agree. Scary stuff! In addition, the ultimate goal of whomever is in charge, is to remove almost everything the previous leader signed into law. Praying for our politicians to meet somewhere in the middle!

  3. Steve says:

    Even worse one of these parties is in the process of taking the reins of power with the objective of never giving it up.

  4. Perry says:

    While your essay very well put today’s political climate in focus it does not however
    give us the recipe for solving the problem except of course to elect centrist candidates.

    In today’s Media environment this is impossible as the leftist follow CNN and NBC while the
    far right Conservatives follow Fox and Breitbart News. There is no media outlet which helps
    to solve the problem, and of course the more the Late Night “Comedians” belittle and besmirch good intentions of conservatives the more entrenched the sides become.

    Civility is nowhere and frankly the appointees of this administration are the least competent to solve issues and work with both sides of the aisle.

    Who is in charge today?? The Media thinks they are and a majority disagree.

  5. Andy Lask says:

    Hal I love the new format for the blog. It looks so much more polished. The ability to easily peruse the past few posts as well as go back in time and reread some of your earlier blogs is a great feature. Your new profile picture is also a nice touch, well done.

  6. Stuart Goldfine says:

    Perry is correct. Why would anyone run for governmental office when the media drags up dirt on that person that happened 30 or 40 years ago? No one knew that Eisenhower, FDR, or Kennedy had mistresses and it was never known by the American public until about 30 years later. The media attacks anyone to the left or the right. Who would ever run?

  7. LWY says:

    If you look at Hitler, when he first took office the first thing he did was control the media and education, so that everyone could believe him and his ideology. In this country, all the major networks (CBS, NBC, ABC), CNN, MSNBC, Hollywood, major newspapers (Washington Post and NY Times), report a one sided biased news. As a result, things that are reported by Fox News never get heard by half the country. Yes, there are a few shows on Fox News that are biased as well, but many of the shows (e.g. Bret Baer, Neil Cavuto, etc.) are more neutral. In fact, the theme for Brett Baer is “Fair and Balanced Reporting”). My point is simply that the press is a major cause of our problem. Politicians from both parties, try to take full advantage of it. How about reporting the news with facts and full reporting. I try to watch all Sunday morning news shows (ABC, CBS and Fox) and I am always disappointed about not only what is reported, but also what is not reported. As an example, how many people who watch ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc, even know about Hunter Biden’s lap tap computer and what was on it? How many people who watch those shows know what is happening and what has happened at our southern border? The news is the root cause of our political crisis.

  8. Steve Hardy says:

    Nice new format Hal. Congratulations!

  9. judy allen says:

    Totally agree! Did you think you’d ever hear that from me…..? lol

    Love the new format, much easier for these old eyes to read.

  10. Harriet says:

    Does anyone believe that Tucker Carlson and Shawn Hannity are providing unbiased reporting? Harriet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *