March 11, 2015

Hillary’s Email Imbroglio: Much Ado About… Who Knows What.

by Hal Gershowitz

Comments Below

Of Thee I Sing Heading AuthorsFormer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, presumptive 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, has managed to maneuver herself into an incredibly Clintonesque corner over her current email contretemps. One could almost hear Frank Sinatra singing in the background, “I did it my way,” as Mrs. Clinton tried to explain to the press her reasons for comingling over 60,000 personal and official State Department emails on her Blackberry.

As everyone now knows, Secretary Clinton conducted 100% of her State Department email correspondence on her own private blackberry, all of which was stored on her own private server. She has announced that she has turned over to the State Department every email they need to see, and they (and we) will see there was nothing about which to be concerned. Everything else (that which she chose not to turn over to the State Department) she says is private and none of the government’s business and none of our business.

Well, hold on. How would anyone know what was or wasn’t the people’s business? Who says so? Ah, Hillary Clinton says so – and that’s the problem. She is telling us that she and her personal counsel have determined which of the tens of thousands of emails she generated during the time she served as Secretary of State, all of which were saved on (and since deleted from) her personal blackberry, and all of which are presumably still etched in her own private server will and will not be made available to the government.

Mrs. Clinton says, in retrospect (translation: now that stuff has hit the fan) she should have used separate devices. “I thought using one device would be simpler, and, obviously, it hasn’t worked out that way,” Mrs. Clinton opined at yesterday’s news conference at the United Nations in New York. “Looking back, it would have been probably…smarter to have used two devices.” Well, not really. How about simply using any smart phone that allows one to have more than one account on it.

As Secretary of State from 2009 until early 2013, Mrs. Clinton exclusively used a personal email account managed through a private computer server in her home in Chappaqua, N.Y. Why in the world, would the nation’s top diplomat do something like that? Well, simply because it gave the Secretary complete control over what communications would ever see the light of day. Specifically, it gave her the final say over what ever would be accessible by the media, by Congress and by the public through our various public-records laws.

Why in the world did she wait two years to turn over some of the emails, instead of turning them all over, which the spirit of the law intended and which (now) the letter of the law requires? It is hard to escape the conclusion that had she not been asked by the government, none of her email correspondence would have been turned over to the government nor could any of it have ever been made available under the Freedom of Information Act.

An obvious answer to every doubter’s question would simply be to have an independent party (perhaps a trusted, non-partisan official of the FBI or the judiciary) review what is still on her server and determine what, if anything might still pertain to State Department business. But alas, Mrs. Clinton has nixed that obvious alternative claiming that all of the remaining (private) 30,000 emails are simply variations of personal correspondence between she and her husband (who says he doesn’t use email) and other personal family matters.

The question isn’t whether Mrs. Clinton is hiding anything. Of course she is. By definition, whatever she has deleted and refused to turn over to the government is hidden – permanently. The more important question is whether what she is hiding is relevant or potentially damaging, improper or unlawful. Frankly we doubt it, but that really isn’t the point. The real problem for Mrs. Clinton is that a reasonable person in high office wouldn’t comingle all of his or her personal email with all of his or her official email. And a reasonable person certainly wouldn’t wait two years after they left office to decide what they would or wouldn’t turn over to the government. And that simply suggests, by definition, that Mrs. Clinton is not (was not) behaving as a reasonable person should behave in high office. Now, that’s not such an aberration in Washington, but it is the last thing Hillary needed the public to be reminded of just before she announces her candidacy for President.

This modus-operandi will have a familiar ring to those Americans old enough (and with long-enough memories) to remember the lost (and subpoenaed) Rose Law Firm billing records that mysteriously turned up (after two years of looking) in the Clinton White House residential quarters. To this day no one knows how those records got there. Well, we presume, almost no one knows.

And who can forget that wonderful 100 to 1 return Mrs. Clinton pocketed on her first-ever cattle futures trade back in 1978. That was when husband Bill was running for Governor and she apparently turned $1,000 (over the course of a year) into $100,000 trading in one of the most risky futures trading pits in the world (especially for first-time traders). Mrs. Clinton had insisted that she did it all on her own after learning how by reading one article in the Wall Street Journal. Actually, the reader may recall, it later came out that James Blair, outside counsel to Arkansas corporate heavyweight Tyson Foods (a company regulated by the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission), turned out to be her guide. That may have been the first time we heard I did it my way, playing in the background.

Back in 1997, Mrs. Clinton’s penchant for secrecy almost cost her husband’s Administration $286,000. A suit in federal court determined that the health-care task force Hillary was running had “run amok” in its pursuit of secrecy. Federal judge Royce Lamberth’s financial sanctions were later rescinded on appeal because an appellate court found that there was no ill intent in the secrecy. It was, in effect, just an early case of Hillary saying, “I did it my way.”

There is not, however, a plausible “great right wing conspiracy” to blame for this mess as she has blamed prior messes on. It is a mess purely of her own making. It is almost breathtaking to contemplate that she believes that the inconvenience of carrying two phones or having two accounts on one phone justified her massive comingling of personal and official email correspondence, and that she and she alone should determine what the government sees and what it doesn’t see. As John Stewart quipped, “I think the concern…is that the aides are the ones that get to decide which emails are appropriate to be shared as opposed to an independent arbiter. That is why Doritos doesn’t get to decide which ingredients consumers need to know about, or why you don’t get to tell the cops which pocket to search.”

 This public relations train wreck will not, by itself, do great harm to Mrs. Clinton’s presidential aspirations. She has not, however, enjoyed a good run-up to the coming formal announcement of her candidacy. Her book tour was a flop and she has avoided the press like the plague for the last five or six months. This was a very bad coming out party.

Screen Shot 2014-04-02 at 10.00.36 PM


All comments regarding these essays, whether they express agreement, disagreement, or an alternate view, are appreciated and welcome. Comments that do not pertain to the subject of the essay or which are ad hominem references to other commenters are not acceptable and will be deleted.

Invite friends, family, and colleagues to receive “Of Thee I Sing 1776” online commentaries. Simply copy, paste, and email them this link—  –and they can begin receiving these weekly essays every Sunday morning.

7 responses to “Hillary’s Email Imbroglio: Much Ado About… Who Knows What.”

  1. Don Borsand says:

    When dealing with the Clinton’s something is rotten in Denmark

  2. Judy Allen says:

    The Clintons wouldn’t know the truth if it bit them. Frightening!

    Totally over her “sexism” game too …. Real feminist would never sink so low!!!

  3. susan duman says:

    I’m speechless after reading your piece.
    When duplicity and tricks come from an unusually gifted politician, I’m in trouble with making an informed decision.

    Any ideas?

  4. Irwin Yablans says:

    While Mrs, Clinton;s behavior is indeed questionable,I would have expected a more relevant topic this week.The shameful conduct of those simple minded republican ideologues,driven by hatred for the president and their infamous letter to Iran.
    Maybe next week?

  5. Janice Marcus says:

    Wouldn’t the republicans love to have the opportunity to see all of Hillary’s private emails!! Then they could make the election about any personal issues they find damming.
    I agree with Mr. Yablans. Move on to important issues.

  6. sheila says:

    Whatever Clinton has done with this email brouhaha is kindergarten compared to what the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld team managed to foist onto the American public, not to mention the U.S. government — the grand daddy of all train wrecks. I can start with the election of 2000, and move to the unconscionable outing of Valerie Plame (for which they let the hapless Scooter Libby take the rap). Somewhere in those years was the the firing of 8 justice department attorneys and, as a grand finale, they brought upon us a war which was based on fabricated evidence, changed forever the geopolitics of the middle East and unleashed the world’s worst nightmare in the form of ISIS and Boko Haram. You couldn’t make up a story that terrifying. I could go on, but you get the point. I think it is unfair to skewer Hillary Clinton based on a misstep, which this was. She is a politician, and there are no politicians out there that pass the smell test with flying colors. I think it is crucial to look at Clinton’s entire portfolio of experience as a leader, her values, how she will change the the Supreme Court and the country – and how she will navigate the very dangerous waters we live in relative to geopolitics, climate change and global warming, the politicization of clean water, etc. Clinton has not yet declared her candidacy — but if there is anyone else out there who can even come close to what she has to offer, I’d like to hear about it. In the end, it comes down to choosing the best out of what we’ve got – and so far, she’s it.

  7. What’s up, I log on to your blogs on a regular basis.
    Your writing style is witty, keep up the good work! /EltonFiliberto/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *